<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PURE Version 2 Is Out For Trial</title>
	<atom:link href="http://beebole.com/blog/pure/pure-version-2-is-out-for-trial/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://beebole.com/blog/pure/pure-version-2-is-out-for-trial/</link>
	<description>The News about the Easiest and Fastest Timesheet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2012 18:59:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Yves</title>
		<link>http://beebole.com/blog/pure/pure-version-2-is-out-for-trial/#comment-247</link>
		<dc:creator>Yves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 04:59:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beebole.com/en/blog/?p=1008#comment-247</guid>
		<description>Hi Troy,

The version 2.0 is the one you should definitively use.

Most of PURE users are using it, we use it for our web app BeeBole and as you can see on the gitHub branch, the updates are frequent: http://github.com/pure/pure/commits/version2

But you are right, the docs, website, ... are a little bit obsolete.

So consider V 2.0 as stable and usable for PROD. Before a complete documentation is made available, I suggest you to have a look at our example page: http://beebole.com/pure/version2/

Any feedback or showcase about how you are using PURE is more than welcome.

Speak to you soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Troy,</p>
<p>The version 2.0 is the one you should definitively use.</p>
<p>Most of PURE users are using it, we use it for our web app BeeBole and as you can see on the gitHub branch, the updates are frequent: <a href="http://github.com/pure/pure/commits/version2" rel="nofollow">http://github.com/pure/pure/commits/version2</a></p>
<p>But you are right, the docs, website, &#8230; are a little bit obsolete.</p>
<p>So consider V 2.0 as stable and usable for PROD. Before a complete documentation is made available, I suggest you to have a look at our example page: <a href="http://beebole.com/pure/version2/" rel="nofollow">http://beebole.com/pure/version2/</a></p>
<p>Any feedback or showcase about how you are using PURE is more than welcome.</p>
<p>Speak to you soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Troy Sabin</title>
		<link>http://beebole.com/blog/pure/pure-version-2-is-out-for-trial/#comment-246</link>
		<dc:creator>Troy Sabin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 17:13:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beebole.com/en/blog/?p=1008#comment-246</guid>
		<description>I appreciate you developing and sharing this great library.  I&#039;ve been trying to determine the status of the 2.0 release by browsing through the forums, blog, and docs, but I haven&#039;t been able to reach a conclusion, other than the primary download on the PURE site is still the 1.34 version.

We&#039;re starting a new project and would like to use 2.0, if it is considered stable.  Is it being used on the production BeeBole site?  Are there any major bugs/issues or breaking changes coming?  Any insight into the status of the 2.0 version would be appreciated.

Thanks,

Troy Sabin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I appreciate you developing and sharing this great library.  I&#8217;ve been trying to determine the status of the 2.0 release by browsing through the forums, blog, and docs, but I haven&#8217;t been able to reach a conclusion, other than the primary download on the PURE site is still the 1.34 version.</p>
<p>We&#8217;re starting a new project and would like to use 2.0, if it is considered stable.  Is it being used on the production BeeBole site?  Are there any major bugs/issues or breaking changes coming?  Any insight into the status of the 2.0 version would be appreciated.</p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
<p>Troy Sabin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

